The Paintings of James McNeill Whistler

M.1074
Note in Violet and Green

Note in Violet and Green

Artist: James McNeill Whistler
Date: 1872/1874, 1885/1888
Collection: Freer Gallery of Art, Washington, DC
Accession Number: F1905.128a-b
Medium: chalk and pastel
Support: brown wove paper, laid down
Size: 10 7/8 x 6 7/16" (276 x 163 mm)
Signature: butterfly
Inscription: none

Date

Note in Violet and Green was started in the early 1870s and reworked in the mid-1880s.

Note in Violet and Green, Freer Gallery of Art
Note in Violet and Green, Freer Gallery of Art

It is fully catalogued in MacDonald 1995 (cat. rais.) [more] (cat. no. 1074).

Images

Note in Violet and Green, Freer Gallery of Art
Note in Violet and Green, Freer Gallery of Art

Harmony in Blue and Violet, Freer Gallery of Art
Harmony in Blue and Violet, Freer Gallery of Art

Subject

Sitter

Note in Violet and Green, Freer Gallery of Art
Note in Violet and Green, Freer Gallery of Art

Harmony in Blue and Violet, Freer Gallery of Art
Harmony in Blue and Violet, Freer Gallery of Art

Not identified. She posed also for Harmony in Blue and Violet m1076.

Technique

Technique

Note in Violet and Green, Freer Gallery of Art
Note in Violet and Green, Freer Gallery of Art

See MacDonald 1995 (cat. rais.) [more] (cat. no. 1074).

History

Provenance

Further details are given in MacDonald 1995 (cat. rais.) [more] (cat. no. 1074).

Exhibitions

John Calcott Horsley (1817-1903) (nicknamed 'Clothes Horsley') had publicly deplored the moral effect of drawing from the nude on both artist and model. Therefore, according to the Pall Mall Gazette of 8 December 1885, Whistler added the note 'Horsley soit qui mal y pense' to one of his drawings, then on show at the Society of British Artists. The Observer on 29 November 1885 commented that 'a female figure whose excessively slight drapery is the result of some half dozen strokes of the crayon, conveys Mr. Whistler’s contribution to the model controversy in the legend "Horsley soit qui mal y pense".' The St James Gazette on 7 December 1885 asserted that the Horsley note was attached to Harmony in Opal and Violet m1075, but according to the Pall Mall Gazette it was attached to 'Note in Violet and Green'. The Pall Mall Gazette called the label 'an indignant protest against the idea that there is any immorality in the nude'. Whistler replied: "Art certainly requires no 'indignant protest' against the unseemliness of senility. "Horsley soit qui mal y pense" is meanwhile a sweet sentiment - why more - and why 'morality'?" 1

These two pastels – Note in Violet and Green and Harmony in Opal and Violet – were apparently similar, and Frederick Wedmore (1844-1921) commented, 'they are very well chosen, and very well placed models, lightly draped and drawn with a delicate vision of what it is most graceful to include and most wise to omit.' 2 Truth described the exhibited 'Note in Violet and Green' as 'a scantily-draped female figure bearing the legend, "Horsley soit qui mal y pense." ' 3 The St James Gazette described it further: 'a girl in diaphanous drapery leans doubtful for a second against the edge of her bath... its modelling is perfect so far as it goes.' 4 This description fits the existing pastel Note in Violet and Green m1074 but the colour scheme does not match that pastel very well. Thus it is not absolutely certain to which pastel the note was attached; in any case, the SBA committee asked Whistler to remove the note, which he did.

NOTE: By the terms of Freer's will, this work cannot be lent to another venue.

Bibliography

Catalogues Raisonnés

Authored by Whistler

Catalogues 1855-1905

Newspapers 1855-1905

Journals 1855-1905

Catalogues 1906-Present

Websites


Notes:

1: Reprinted in Whistler 1890 [more], p. 195.

2: Wedmore, Frederick, 'The Society of British Artists', Academy, vol. 28, 19 December 1885, p. 417.

3: 'The British Artists', Truth, London, 3 December 1885, p. 16.

4: 'The British Artists', St James Gazette, London, 7 December 1885, p. 6.