r.: Butterfly for 'Noblesse abuse'; v.: tail was drawn in 1899 as an illustration for Whistler 1899 (F)[more].
r.: Butterfly for 'Noblesse abuse', Glasgow University Library
It is catalogued in MacDonald 1995 (cat. rais.) [more] (cat. no. 1550).
r.: Butterfly for 'Noblesse abuse', Glasgow University Library
v.: Tail, Glasgow University Library
"Noblesse abuse!", Eden versus Whistler: The Baronet and the Butterfly, Glasgow University Library
r.: Butterfly for 'Noblesse abuse', Glasgow University Library
A butterfly facing forward and to left, with wide-spread shaded wings, and a barbed tail curving down to left.
In 1894 William Eden (1849-1915) commissioned a portrait of his wife Sybil Frances Grey, Lady Eden (1867-1945). Whistler, dissatisfied with the amount (100gns) and manner of payment, retained and altered the portrait (Brown and Gold: Portrait of Lady Eden y408). After an appeal, in December 1897, the Court de Cassation let him retain the portrait but return the money. Whistler was well satisfied to see the Code Napoléon altered, to specify an artist's right to decide the fate of his works.
Whistler planned to publish an account of the affair, including letters, newspaper reports and legal documents, with William Heinemann (1863-1920), who had published the Gentle Art of Making Enemies in 1890. but, with Heinemann’s tacit agreement, Louis-Henry May in Paris took over the publication. A first proof was run off, using mainly butterflies originally drawn for the Gentle Art of Making Enemies. These butterflies were mostly replaced by new ones, in a second proof. There are at least two versions of some of the designs. They were slightly reduced in size in the final publication.
For the book, Whistler designed 15 butterflies, a club (A club on a cushion m1564), and a frog (Frog m1553). He also drew some butterflies that were not used (v.: Butterfly; r.: see No. 1268 m1572, Butterfly with chequered wings m1578, r.: Butterfly; v.: Butterfly with chequered wings m1579). The Baronet and the Butterfly was comparatively sparing of butterflies: many marginal annotations lacked a butterfly. Some of the butterflies were badly reproduced (r. and v.: Butterfly m1561, r.: Butterfly 'Encountered'; v.: Butterfly m1562). There were publication problems, and it was not an entirely satisfactory venture. However, Whistler did not admit of criticism and seems, publicly, to have been entirely satisfied with the outcome.
r.: Butterfly for 'Noblesse abuse', Glasgow University Library
"Noblesse abuse!", Eden versus Whistler: The Baronet and the Butterfly, Glasgow University Library
This butterfly replaced Butterfly for 'Noblesse abuse!' m1549, and was in turn replaced by Butterfly for 'Noblesse abuse!' m1551, for publication in Whistler 1899 (F)[more], p. i.
It was drawn in pencil, pen and black ink, with corrections in white paint. In the final version, Butterfly for 'Noblesse abuse!' m1551, the butterfly is bowing to the left, and the trefoil/wings are more oval, and not so broken up as in this study
This is one of several drawings inset into sheets before being bound into a copy of the The Baronet and the Butterfly. The sheet is darkened and foxed, with small holes at upper left.
The early provenance is unknown.
It was not, as far as is known, exhibited in Whistler's lifetime.