The Paintings of James McNeill Whistler

M.1553
Frog

Frog

Artist: James McNeill Whistler
Date: 1899
Collection: Library of Congress, Washington, DC
Accession Number: 2006678408
Medium: pen, brown ink and white paint
Support: tan tracing paper laid down on card
Size: 2 11/16 x 2 11/16" paper; card 8 1/2 x 6 11/16" (69 x 69 mm paper; card 216 x 170 mm)
Signature: none
Inscription: on card, r.: 'this/ this/ Reduced to this size/ measured from forehead/ to lower line of belly.'; v.: in unknown hands '38310/ Wm Heinemann/ 4% Today Special/ good block/ 8-89-806.29'; stamp of LC Division of Prints

Date

Frog was drawn in 1899 as an illustration for Whistler 1899 (F)[more].

Frog, Library Of Congress
Frog, Library Of Congress

It is catalogued in MacDonald 1995 (cat. rais.) [more] (cat. no. 1553).

Images

Frog, Library Of Congress
Frog, Library Of Congress

 Frog, Eden versus Whistler: The Baronet and the Butterfly, p. v, Glasgow University Library
Frog, Eden versus Whistler: The Baronet and the Butterfly, p. v, Glasgow University Library

Subject

Sitter

Frog, Library Of Congress
Frog, Library Of Congress

On 25 September 1898, Whistler described the problem of finding a frog as model:

'I was to apply for one to the Zoological Gardens, Wimbush was to find one, but in the meanwhile Teddy Godwin brought one and made a drawing of it. But the thing died. You know they say I starved it. They had put it in a paper box. Well, it must have caught a fly or two. And I thought that toads lived in amber or something for hundreds of years. Perhaps it was because I hadn't the amber.' 1

Comments

In 1894 William Eden (1849-1915) commissioned a portrait of his wife Sybil Frances Grey, Lady Eden (1867-1945). Whistler, dissatisfied with the amount (100gns) and manner of payment, retained and altered the portrait (Brown and Gold: Portrait of Lady Eden y408). After an appeal, in December 1897, the Court de Cassation let him retain the portrait but return the money. Whistler was well satisfied to see the Code Napoléon altered, to specify an artist's right to decide the fate of his works.

Whistler planned to publish an account of the affair, a compilation of letters, newspaper reports and legal documents, with William Heinemann (1863-1920), who had published the Gentle Art of Making Enemies in 1890. There was some problem with publishing in London, and, with Heinemann’s tacit agreement, Louis-Henry May in Paris took over the publication. A first proof was run off, using mainly butterflies originally drawn for the Gentle Art of Making Enemies. These butterflies were mostly replaced by new ones, in a second proof. There are at least two versions of some of the designs. They were slightly reduced in size in the final publication.

For the book, Whistler designed 15 butterflies, a club (A club on a cushion m1564), and the Frog. He also drew some butterflies which were not used (v.: Butterfly; r.: see No. 1268 m1572, Butterfly with chequered wings m1578, r.: Butterfly; v.: Butterfly with chequered wings m1579). The Baronet and the Butterfly was comparatively sparing of butterflies. Many marginal annotations, which in the Gentle Art of Making Enemies would have warranted a butterfly, did not get one. Some of the butterflies were very badly reproduced (r. and v.: Butterfly m1561, r.: Butterfly 'Encountered'; v.: Butterfly m1562). There were obviously publication problems, and it was not an entirely satisfactory venture. However, Whistler did not admit of criticism and seems, publicly, to have been entirely satisfied with the outcome.

Technique

Composition

Frog, Library Of Congress
Frog, Library Of Congress

 Frog, Eden versus Whistler: The Baronet and the Butterfly, p. v, Glasgow University Library
Frog, Eden versus Whistler: The Baronet and the Butterfly, p. v, Glasgow University Library

It was drawn for publication above the Dedication in Whistler 1899 (F)[more], p. v.

Technique

It was drawn in pen and brown ink with corrections in white paint.

Conservation History

The paper darkened to orangey beige, and laid down on off-white card, which has pinholes at the edges for transfer. A proof on a small, irregular (40 x 42/30 mm) scrap of paper was stuck above the drawing to provide a scale for reproduction.

History

Provenance

The earlier history is unknown, See MacDonald 1995 (cat. rais.) [more] (cat. no. 1553).

Bibliography

Catalogues Raisonnés

Authored by Whistler

Books on Whistler

Websites


Notes:

1: Pennell 1921C [more], p. 19.