Butterfly was drawn as an illustration for Whistler 1899 (F)[more].
Butterfly, Art Institute of Chicago
It is catalogued in MacDonald 1995 (cat. rais.) [more] (cat. no. 1568).
Butterfly, Art Institute of Chicago
Butterfly, Art Institute of Chicago
A butterfly with shaded wings, and with barbed tail curving round to right.
In 1894 William Eden (1849-1915) commissioned a portrait of his wife Sybil Frances Grey, Lady Eden (1867-1945). Whistler, dissatisfied with the amount (100gns) and manner of payment, retained and altered the portrait (Brown and Gold: Portrait of Lady Eden y408). After an appeal, in December 1897, the Court de Cassation let him retain the portrait but return the money. Whistler was well satisfied to see the Code Napoléon altered, to specify an artist's right to decide the fate of his works.
Whistler planned to publish an account of the affair, a compilation of letters, newspaper reports and legal documents, with William Heinemann (1863-1920), who had published the Gentle Art of Making Enemies in 1890. There was some problem with publishing in London, and, with Heinemann’s tacit agreement, Louis-Henry May in Paris took over the publication. A first proof was run off, using mainly butterflies originally drawn for the Gentle Art of Making Enemies. These butterflies were mostly replaced by new ones, in a second proof. There are at least two versions of some of the designs. They were slightly reduced in size in the final publication.
For the book, Whistler designed 15 butterflies, a club (A club on a cushion m1564), and a frog (Frog m1553). He also drew some butterflies which were not used (v.: Butterfly; r.: see No. 1268 m1572, Butterfly with chequered wings m1578, r.: Butterfly; v.: Butterfly with chequered wings m1579). The Baronet and the Butterfly was comparatively sparing of butterflies. Many marginal annotations, which in the Gentle Art of Making Enemies would have warranted a butterfly, did not get one. Some of the butterflies were very badly reproduced (r. and v.: Butterfly m1561, r.: Butterfly 'Encountered'; v.: Butterfly m1562). There were obviously publication problems, and it was not an entirely satisfactory venture. However, Whistler did not admit of criticism and seems, publicly, to have been entirely satisfied with the outcome.
Butterfly, Art Institute of Chicago
This was drawn for publication in Whistler 1899 (F)[more]. It is similar to the butterfly on p. 58 but the tail is different.
The pen lines are freely and fluidly drawn except for the butterfly's right antenna, which has been altered.
See further details in Clarke, Jay A., and Sarah Kelly Oehler, eds., Whistler Paintings and Drawings at the Art Institute of Chicago, The Art Institute of Chicago, 2020, website.
It is on the same card as Butterfly m1566 and it has rough edges on three sides (not on the right). The card has darkened a little, except at right, and there are pinholes in the two left corners and to right of lower centre. There is some rubbing and finger prints, on the butterfly.
The earlier provenance is unknown. See MacDonald 1995 (cat. rais.) [more] (cat. no. 1561).
It was not exhibited in Whistler's lifetime.